L RECORDS
JSR
Docket No: NRL697-14
10 April 2014
Dear sergeant
orrection of Naval
considered your
ations of error
istrative
ceedings of this
d consisted
a three-member panel of the Board for ¢
Records, sitting in executive session,
lication on 10 April 2014. your alleg
rdance with admin
to the pro
and
record and apP
attached.
onsideration of the entire
submitted was
£ probable material
In this connection, the Board substantially
mmnents contained in the report of the PERE.
been denied. The names and
Biter careful
record, the Board found
insufficient to es
error or injustice.
concurred with the co
accordingly, your application has
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
tion cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
ission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
Tet DS
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4749 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your reconsideration request on 28 April’ 2014. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by Docket No.NR04749-14 the Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1694 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1693 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 April 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1295 14
RB three-member panel of the Board ‘for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 May 2014. in addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 3 April 2014, a copy of which +s attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1696 14
Documentary material consider of your application, together with al naval record an panel of the Board for ession Your 4 dance cable regulations and report of the Headqua Review Board (PERB), attached. Sw JSR Docket No: NR1696-14 10 April 2014 son for correction of your f title 10 of the Correction of Naval , considered your Lllegations of error and with administrative to the proceedings of this ed by the Board consisted 1 material submitted in d applicable statutes, dad considered...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1712 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1711 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 April 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1699 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 April 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1346 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, reconsidered your case on 22 May 2014. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4760 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...